Tag Archive 'Post Register'

May 09 2010

Liz

Post Register Ethics Requirements Reasonable?

Filed under Politics

(I wrote this for another site, in 2008.  I still think it’s a valid question in this current election year.)

Post Register employees can’t publicly express a partisan political opinion, apparently.  Because they are a news organization, (and possibly especially because they have been accused a million times of being too liberal for the citizens they serve), they have a code of ethics that prohibits their employees from being publicly partisan.

 

What good does that requirement do?  They can’t prohibit private partisan viewpoints.  And the employees have ways around the rules. 

 

Case in point:  They didn’t force an employee to remove political signs from his yard because he said the signs were there by right of his wife, (who was not a Post Register employee), to express her political opinions.  So, the employee who is single can’t put signs up, but an employee who is married can do so, as long as the spouse says the signs really belong to them.

 

An editor (obits, opinion page) had to resign a minor position with the local Democratic Party, lest she be seen as partisan if she elected to exercise any editing discretion on a letter to the editor.  Okay, that seems reasonable, in that it becomes a matter of perception, if the letter being edited was a letter of support for a Republican candidate.

 

But what I do at work is not the same as what I do after hours.  I am able to make that distinction.  I do not speak for my employer when I am not on the clock.  So as long as I comport myself with reasonable dignity and don’t bring shame or disgrace to my employer through criminal activity, why would my personal time need to be regulated against the ethics of my employment time?

 

Do you agree that employees of the Post Register (or any news organization) should refrain from partisan activity? 

3 responses so far

Mar 03 2010

kymberly

It’s Citizens’ Arrest Time!

Filed under Community Issues

or as I am now fond of saying, “Let the internet be the horse you ride in to town, and let your signature be the six-shooter that returns the place to order.”
 
It’s time to deputize yourself and prepare to fight for a healthy, sexy America that’s free like a unbridled Mustang, not one that’s held at gunpoint by an evil band of insurance lobbyists. 
 
The scoop…
 
Blue Cross (and others) has the “right to vote”.
 
That means We The People have the right to demand accountability for the crimes commited by your bad asses.  
 
 
Join today.  
 
Day of action - next Tuesday.
 
PS - dugski and I have (so far) received amazing response to the story about us in yesterday’s Post Register (front page, above-the-fold - we’re famous!). Thanks to Dan Henry for leading us to Clark Corbin who did a wonderful job of condensing my emotive verbosity into something resembling cohesive thought.  (Hug a writer today, because the good ones really do deserve it.)
 

3 responses so far

Jan 02 2010

darlene

The Post Register Opinions Page is Changing

Filed under Community Issues

Corey Taule, who took over for Marty Trillhaase last year, announced in the first Post Register edition of 2010 that the PR was making changes to the Opinions page…specifically in the Letters to the Editor part, which he acknowledged was the majority of the content of the Opinions page.

I’m interested in this, because it seems counterintuitive to the concept of a freedom of speech page in a newspaper, which is how I’ve always seen the Opinions page.  Some of the changes announced were downright defiant…they refuse to print any more letters that make the claim that President Obama was not born in the United States.  Corey said he was tired of those letters, as is Roger Plothow, who is the Publisher.  “Enough said”.  Wow.  What a stand to make, it just seems so contrary to the previous years of allowing all the wingnuts for Conspiracy Theorists R Us their usual ad nauseam weekly forum.

See, I’ve always felt the PR was a toady to the local conservative crowd, that they bent over backwards to the point of self-neutering to try to prove they weren’t liberals.  Despite their incessant efforts to publish all the conservative garbage they could get their hands on, it never made a difference.  It didn’t matter how much they catered to that group, the teabaggers and John Birchers never warmed to them and still to this day accuses the PR of being a liberal rag, a mere lackey to the liberal cabal that surely holds the REAL power in South East Idaho.   Bleah!

daily-news

Daily News

They’re also asking for less vitriol.  Again, wow!  Attacking your favorite whipping boy (GWB, BHO, RR, etc) by using sarcastic terms and outright name-calling is now supposed to be taboo.  Yeah, right.  I’ll believe that when I stop reading it, which would be a total blessing, imho.  I’m crossing my fingers on this one, that they really do what they are threatening to do. 

 

And I wonder what the effect of this ban will be…will the sarcasm become more subtle, to see what creative options the letter writer can get away with?  And also, will the PR edit or delete the online Post Talks forum nastiness, which tends to be pretty virulent at times?

And they’re calling for an end to letters and columns that pretty much deal with -isms they define as capitalism, socialism, (communism? conservatism/liberalism? ) etc.  What?  No 450 words on how our Constitution is in trouble because we’ve suddenly become a Marxist state?  No 250 words on how Obama is a socialist and bringing the New World Order to fruition and we all must answer a call to revolution to take back our country from the tyranny it is facing?

The only reason this feels bad to me is that I’ve always felt the community newspaper was supposed to be an open forum for all, even the crazy people.  Of course, some things such as profanity would always be edited out (it had fucking better be, little kids read the paper when their parents forget to throw it out in a hurry!) and threats of violence against someone else would not be printed due to legal liabilities, etc.  But almost every other damned crazy thing was always printed, to my dismay and delight at the same time.  Our paper.  Our page, content by our community.

Until now.  And that is the end of an era to me.  In fact, it smacks of private control.  It smacks of intelligent planning (I wanted to say “design” there but that term was co-opted by the freaks).  It smacks of a business saying, this is who we are and you are welcome to play on our turf but you must play by certain rules of civility that we have determined will meet our sensibilities.   Interesting concept, and something I’ve always wanted, but a change to my view of a community newspaper as an open community forum.

But there’s hope.  According to Corey:

On the other hand, well-researched columns that deal with specific issues, especially local ones, or even tell a good story will be accepted enthusiastically and published quickly, no matter whether they come from the left, right or center.

   Can I get an amen, brothers and sisters?  Cheers and kudos to the Post Register, if they will hold firm and stick to their stated principles.

6 responses so far

Sep 15 2009

darlene

Snake River Landing is Coming Along Nicely

Filed under Community Issues

It’s quite pretty, visually.  I’ve driven through it and seen the landscaping that has taken place, and you can tell, they’re taking care to make it attractive.

The only businesses I’ve gone to there are the two restaurants, Iggy’s and Hard Hat.  Both are pretty decent food and service.   Apparently they also have a coffee house, so I may check that out soon.

Per the Post Register today, they are planning to introduce residential lots in the next year.  And they have a recreational area almost ready to open that they’re calling “Central Valley” which will be lots of little streams flowing to a small lake, and landscaped walkways running through the area. 

For more information about the new development, go to their website.

2 responses so far

Jul 29 2009

darlene

Post Register Uses a Blogger as a News Source

Filed under Community Issues

How interesting is that?  In today’s Post Register story on loan guarantees being shaky for the Idaho location of Areva, reporter Sven Berg quotes Dan Yurman, who has the Idaho Samizdat blog, (focusing on all things nuclear).

And it’s not like he’s quoting Dan for an opinion, Dan is the source of the “news”.  The expert.  The go-to person if you’re writing about nuclear power in Eastern Idaho.

Being a blogger is no longer an automatic credibility discount in the serious news department.  Woo hoo!

2 responses so far

Apr 15 2009

darlene

The Lewiston Morning Tribune’s Gain…

Filed under Community Issues

…Is our loss. 

But maybe Marty Trillhaase felt it was time to move on.  I don’t know if the timing is anything to wonder about, being right after the Dean Miller weirdness, but for whatever reason, I’m sorry to see him go.

They printed lots of good quotes in the paper, from ostensible opponents.  I think he will be a great fit at the Lewiston Morning Tribune, they certainly aren’t as overwhelmingly conservative thereabouts.  It’s not all bad, I guess we’ll still get to read his opinons once in awhile on slow news days.

My current favorite for the new Opinions Page Editor?  Paul Menser.  He’s got a way with words, he’s opinionated (sorry, Paul, but that’s a true story) and he may be currently making good money at sales, but it’s a waste of his talents.  Much better to go back to writing, methinks.

No responses yet

Feb 19 2009

administrator

Dean Miller Ousted from the Post Register

Filed under Community Issues

Oh, the scandal and the hue and cry in this tiny little burg!  I’m not even sure where to start.

Brilliant but no thanks

Brilliant but no thanks

Dean Miller, the Executive Editor of the Post Register, was “fired”.  These things are never clearly and completely known by the public, or even other employees of the Post Register.  Personnel issues are touchy and usually no one really wants to say (or can legally say), exactly what happened.  Therefore rumors abound and speculation rules the blogosphere.

The story in today’s paper generated some pretty intense Post Talk.   jemcgimpsey (is this John, the Democratic candidate for the Idaho Legislature, who lost the last two local elections?) commented several times, and was very thorough and reasonable.  Of course, that’s his style…which didn’t appeal to the voters although I admired him for it.  John did use terms that caused Roger Plothow to respond…John said that the management action, given what was printed, seemed ‘incompetent or capricious’.   

The fact of the matter seems to boil down to, the direction Dean was taking the Post Register was at odds with where the management wanted to go, so it was time to part ways.  They mentioned cumulative things.  Well, he was a firebrand by comparison to the rather staid and stuffy community.  There were many questionable ‘news’ stories.  He did ruffle many feathers locally, not the least of which was Frank Vandersloot’s.

I guess the local Mormons buy a lot of dildoes but they don’t want you to make it front page news when they do.  And they allow their kids to go to Scout camp where the management knows about pedophiles, and they are pissed off if you try to suggest that isn’t a safe place for their sons.   And how dare you print that Frank’s wife was a huge donor to the Proposition Hate 8 campaign in California?   Or say that their church encouraged members to do the same?

You might be brilliant but apparently you need to take your brilliance the hell out of here, Dean.  I wish you well in a more enlightened venue.  Too bad we’re not ready for your kind of prime time here in SE Idaho.

One response so far

Feb 15 2009

administrator

Why Lose the Monday Edition?

Filed under Community Issues

I believe the Post Register’s decision to eliminate the Monday edition in its efforts to save costs and save jobs, was very logical.  Initially last year when they asked about the steps they should take, and presented several options, my thought was, we did well for many years without a Saturday edition.  Take your Saturday edition back, it’s nothing special.  Let your delivery folks have a weekend day that they can sleep in, as the rest of us do.

But I finally had an epiphany today as I was thinking about the way this works for the PR staff.  The paper is written/edited and entered for printing, the day BEFORE it is delivered. 

So if you’re going to have a day of rest for your staff, so to speak, it’s not the day there is no paper.  It’s the Sunday before the Monday edition is delivered, that now becomes a day off for almost everyone.  (Since they are still putting some content online, someone is having to work, somewhere before Monday morning.)

Interesting.  Sundays off.  And everyone thought the Post Register was a Godless newspaper…

One response so far