May 09 2010
Post Register Ethics Requirements Reasonable?
(I wrote this for another site, in 2008. I still think it’s a valid question in this current election year.)
Post Register employees can’t publicly express a partisan political opinion, apparently. Because they are a news organization, (and possibly especially because they have been accused a million times of being too liberal for the citizens they serve), they have a code of ethics that prohibits their employees from being publicly partisan.
What good does that requirement do? They can’t prohibit private partisan viewpoints. And the employees have ways around the rules.
Case in point: They didn’t force an employee to remove political signs from his yard because he said the signs were there by right of his wife, (who was not a Post Register employee), to express her political opinions. So, the employee who is single can’t put signs up, but an employee who is married can do so, as long as the spouse says the signs really belong to them.
An editor (obits, opinion page) had to resign a minor position with the local Democratic Party, lest she be seen as partisan if she elected to exercise any editing discretion on a letter to the editor. Okay, that seems reasonable, in that it becomes a matter of perception, if the letter being edited was a letter of support for a Republican candidate.
But what I do at work is not the same as what I do after hours. I am able to make that distinction. I do not speak for my employer when I am not on the clock. So as long as I comport myself with reasonable dignity and don’t bring shame or disgrace to my employer through criminal activity, why would my personal time need to be regulated against the ethics of my employment time?
Do you agree that employees of the Post Register (or any news organization) should refrain from partisan activity?

