Archive for the 'Politics' Category

May 09 2010

Liz

Post Register Ethics Requirements Reasonable?

Filed under Politics

(I wrote this for another site, in 2008.  I still think it’s a valid question in this current election year.)

Post Register employees can’t publicly express a partisan political opinion, apparently.  Because they are a news organization, (and possibly especially because they have been accused a million times of being too liberal for the citizens they serve), they have a code of ethics that prohibits their employees from being publicly partisan.

 

What good does that requirement do?  They can’t prohibit private partisan viewpoints.  And the employees have ways around the rules. 

 

Case in point:  They didn’t force an employee to remove political signs from his yard because he said the signs were there by right of his wife, (who was not a Post Register employee), to express her political opinions.  So, the employee who is single can’t put signs up, but an employee who is married can do so, as long as the spouse says the signs really belong to them.

 

An editor (obits, opinion page) had to resign a minor position with the local Democratic Party, lest she be seen as partisan if she elected to exercise any editing discretion on a letter to the editor.  Okay, that seems reasonable, in that it becomes a matter of perception, if the letter being edited was a letter of support for a Republican candidate.

 

But what I do at work is not the same as what I do after hours.  I am able to make that distinction.  I do not speak for my employer when I am not on the clock.  So as long as I comport myself with reasonable dignity and don’t bring shame or disgrace to my employer through criminal activity, why would my personal time need to be regulated against the ethics of my employment time?

 

Do you agree that employees of the Post Register (or any news organization) should refrain from partisan activity? 

3 responses so far

Feb 24 2010

kymberly

Maybe the Best Group for Patriotic Americans

Filed under Politics

“The Coffee Party”.
coffee-party-usa
 
From their Facebook page -
 
We recognize that the federal gov’t is not the enemy of the people, but the expression of our collective will…As voters & volunteers, we will support leaders who work toward positive solutions, & hold accountable those who obstruct them.
 
- beats the snot out of obtusely fighting AGAINST oneself, like the Teabaggers do.  (Does anybody else inadvertantly spell it “Teagagger” then have to go back and fix it?…or it is just me?)
 
And remember to remind your Teabagger (I did it again) friends that unless they make enough to buy their own island, they just got a tax cut under Obama’s rein.  (The mainstream “news” isn’t advertising this too damned much…gee I wonder why.)  Let’s do what we can to educate the Teabaggers with actual facts, shall we?
.
Thanks for alerting me to the existence of this site, Darlene.

                                                                                                                                                                                                          .

6 responses so far

Feb 17 2010

darlene

Why Nothing Gets Done

Filed under Politics

Dan Henry as the local host of Drinking Liberally sends out a weekly email newsletter.  This man is tremendously talented, smart, funny, and makes you think.

 

This week, he makes me want to cry.  Well, actually, not because of something he said, but something he asks us to read.  He gave a link to a really cool website called “Balloon Juice”…specifically, a John Cole blogpost from last week.  It’s a dead-on treatise that explains perfectly what many of us have noticed in the past year-that we as a society, as a country, are screwed.  It paints a grim picture that is both accurate and horrible, which is what makes me want to cry.

 

So many things are so badly out of whack, it’s overwhelming in scope.  And when something is broken so thoroughly, it’s impossible to fix because it’s impossible to know where to start, what area to focus your attention on, to effect positive change.  Usually, you need a flood of Biblical proportions to wipe it all out and start over.  The amount of energy needed to remodel would be almost the same as the amount needed to build again new…isn’t that a call for revolution? 

 

Any ideas?  Or must I be a nihilist, without hope, cynical that nothing can be done because the tides and forces of society are aloof and pitiless in their ceaseless onslaught, caring naught for the likes of puny individuals and their pipe dreams?

                                                                                                                                                                            .      

3 responses so far

Feb 05 2010

kymberly

My Brain Feels Aflutter with Glee

Filed under Politics

I have just experienced an epiphany.
 
Read and learn (this is a short rant).
 
If people vote against their own interests…it is because they resent having their interests decided for them by politicians who think they know best.
There is nothing voters hate more than having things explained to them as though they were idiots.
It’s hard not to take that last sentence and make an ironical comment, but I’m going to start practicing right now by saying, “Okay, then how SHOULD I explain things?”
 
Here is the answer.
As the saying goes, in politics, when you are explaining, you are losing.
  
Okay, now I get it.
 
Try writing a fiction book with the goal being “to sell well” and you will get it, too.  Warning - it’s not as easy as it looks.  I always been in awe of writers who can string words together that transform into several hundred pages of pearls, now I think they have genius perched upon their shoulder everywhere they go. 
 
Obama’s administration made a tremendous mistake by not immediately branding the economic collapse that we had just had as the Republicans’ Depression…
 
What have I been calling it for the last year and a half?  That’s right.  “The Second Great Republican Depression”. 
 
Reverse revolution
 
The Republicans have learnt how to stoke up resentment against the patronising liberal elite…The result is that many of America’s poorest citizens have a deep emotional attachment to a party that serves the interests of its richest.
  
More irony!  And a new-found understanding that in order to get through to some of these people, we MUST stop talking intellectual drivel (except amongst ourselves) and START giving these people ACTION verbs.  It literally is just like writing fiction.  Most fiction in our culture is “conservative” in the sense that most plots serve to restore or maintain order.  Conservatives instinctively get that, while Liberals / Progressives get stuck in exasperation at how Americans can be so stuck in their ways that don’t work any more.   
 
Ideas on how to do this?  I’m open to them.  For now, I’m going to start practicing the skill of fiction crafting in my verbal interactions.  Anybody care to join me?
 
It’s a good article and it’s not long.
.
Notice that it’s from the BBC News (not anything Rupert Murdoch owns).
 
By the way, please enjoy my new siggie (thanks Darlene).  If there was ever a quote to fit me like a glove, this one is it.  Lucky you, who are loved enough by me to receive my regular rants.  ;)
.
“I’m selfish, impatient, and a little insecure, I make mistakes, I am out of control and at times hard to handle. But if you can’t handle me at my worst, then you sure as hell don’t deserve me at my best.”
~Marilyn Monroe

2 responses so far

Jan 05 2010

kymberly

American Revolution History Lesson, Anyone?

Filed under Politics

Americans remember the American Revolution, but how many really know what part the East India Tea Company played?
Today, we have people (Teabaggers) whose heart is in the right place, but their heads are firmly implanted upside their rear ends. 
 
This is a nice, short article about how non-thinking, half-baked comprehending, irrationality is overtaking our country.  It makes we wonder if we’re not like vicious dogs that bite before assessing the actual threat.
… the tea party movement has passion. Think back on the recent decades of American history — the way the hippies defined the 1960s; the feminists, the 1970s; the Christian conservatives, the 1980s. American history is often driven by passionate outsiders who force themselves into the center of American life.
Notice how the movements went like this - civil rights, hippies, feminists, christian conservativism, and now teabaggers.  We started out sane and with great ideals, but in the eighties, when REAGAN took over (and started to cut funding for education), all of a sudden, our lunatic fringe instantly began to grow less reasoned and more reactive.  Coincidence?  Not a chance.
 
It’s the passion from the people that does ultimately drive the movement of our government.  What sucks now is, our passionate people are also our most ill-informed…largely thanks to the very tv “news” programming they watch, and then rail against.  (Irony alert.)
Rather than working the system as our Founders intended, the teabaggers are grabbing their pitch forks and runningsheeple the monster out of the village, claiming that this is how America all started. 
 
But, “America” is not just starting now.  The teabaggers are cutting off their nose to spite their face.
 
Without a healthy government of, by, and for the people then we will get the oligarchy these teabaggers so desperately fear (as do most of us).
 
A person with a passion and a half-assed comprehension is a dangerous thing. 

7 responses so far

Nov 01 2009

darlene

Oligarchy in the United States

Filed under Politics

I’m tired of the wingnuts out there who believe we’ve become a socialist country.  We are so far from socialism!  What we are is one step away from being an oligarchy.

Wikipedia defines an oligarchy as “a form of government in which power effectively rests with a small elite segment of society distinguished by royal, wealth, intellectual, family, military, or religious hegemony.”

Don Herbst of Rigby has a letter to the editor in today’s Post Register.  He says that rather than capitalism or socialism, what we have is an oligopoly where a relatively small number of sellers control the market. 

Think of “banks that are too large to fail,” insurance companies that carve up health insurance markets state by state with almost no national competition, oil companies, agribusiness conglomerates and all of the other major market segments in this country that are almost completely dominated by a handful of companies.

I am in complete agreement with his assessment!  And if you wonder why this is a bad thing, he continues with how this impacts our political process and our form of government:

As long as we allow political campaigns to be determined by the huge amounts of money spent on almost never ending campaigns and a campaign finance system that essentially allows the very wealthy to literally buy our politicians, there will be precious little liberty or free markets to embrace.

I have said for a long time that we are not a capitalist country, that we are more to the right than those who decry the “advance of socialism” realize (or else they’re just being politically disingenuous).  We have been an oligarchy for far too long, and the biggest proof of that is the fact that we can’t get real health care reform.

8 responses so far

Oct 25 2009

darlene

Noble Sacrifice?

Filed under Politics

Eh.  Facebook “friend” (very conservative, I don’t know her except on facebook) offered to stop listening to Rush Limbaugh if I stopped listening to Rachel Maddow.  Now, what she doesn’t know is that I only listen/watch when I’m in a hotel room while out of town, as I don’t have cable at home…and therefore rarely get to see/hear Rachel.

But I was tempted to agree to stop listening to Rachel, if she would be willing to stop listening to Rush.  I’d take one for the team, there!  Wonder if I should take her up on it??  ;-)

12 responses so far

Oct 08 2009

darlene

Politics as Religion

Filed under Politics

This piece is so powerful.  It totally explains what’s wrong these days, why the country seems to be in the middle of a terrible political upheaval, and why it’s WAR for the conservatives.  Per Neal Gabler in the LA Times:

You cannot beat religion with politics, which is why the extreme right “wins” so many battles. The fundamentalist political fanatics will always be more zealous than mainstream conservatives or liberals. They will always be louder, more adamant, more aggrieved, more threatening, more willing to do anything to win. Losing is inconceivable. For them, every battle is a crusade — or a jihad — a matter of good and evil.

It’s incredibly right-on.  You have to read the entire thing.

2 responses so far

Aug 17 2009

kymberly

Would Hitler have had a man-crush on our president?

Filed under Politics

Oh good hell.  Check it out - Rude Pundit

 

What’s next - the moral majority marching in the gay parade?  Actually, that scenario makes more sense than a smitten Hitler, gah-gah gazing into the eyes of a BLACK man. 

 

This is just sad.  These people have NO idea the ironic message they are sending to rational, thinking individuals.  It is also scary.    It proves beyond a doubt that a formidable portion of our nation has NO clue about history.  Instead, they watch the FOX News (one vowel movement away from what it does to real information), they see the pretty pictures, they hear the propaganda-pontifications, they feel the outrage, and, in a fit of ramped-up rage, they go out, en masse, into the streets of our nation, heck-bent on practicing  their First Amendment right.  Let us just hope they don’t lose their grip entirely and decide to pull out their  Second Amendment rightLike this guy.   Be a responsible citizen, keep it in your pants, America. 

There are those whose head is firmly ensconsed deep within the recesses of their anal cavity.   They drive, they vote, they are our fellow citizens.  Without them, the right would still have a voice, it just would not have a lunatic fringe.  People of the right - have you any respect left for your side of the aisle?  If you do, now might be the time to stand up and speak out rationally.  Hitler snuggling up to Obama?  Threats of violence over healthcare?  Outrage over the evils of the government?  Where the hell was the outrage when W. sent our soldiers tromping in like a herd of elephants to attack a country upon which we waged an illegal war?  Where were your swaztikas and bill-of-rights uproars then?

 

Truly, we as a collective need to remove our heads from our own read ends and start READING and LEARNING and best of all - UNDERSTANDING.  I love a nice, healthy debate - but what we have here (and I know, I recently attended a healthcare rally) is a group of infuriated people who want to be heard, but do not care to hear.  Suck it up.  Listen.  And stop comparing Obama to Hitler.  It just makes your side look stupid.

One response so far

Aug 16 2009

kymberly

Coincidence or childish behavior?

Filed under Politics

We did out healthcare rally Thursday afternoon and guess what?  One of the participants had an act of vandalism visited upon thier house. 

 

Why it is that the left is supposed to tolerate abuse because the fringe right thinks abusing others is part of their “right” to free expression?

3 responses so far

Older Posts »